Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Monday, November 22, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Kevin McAdam
AP English 12/ Mrs. Turick
10/7/10
Essential Question #4
Simplify and analyze Hrothgar's parting words to Beowulf, lines 1708-1767
Hrothgar’s final speech to Beowulf shares some deep insights and displays his immense gratitude towards Beowulf for everything he did for him and the people of Heorot. Hrothgar begins his speech by advising Beowulf to always praise God for everything given to him. Being humans on this earth is a miraculous thing, and Hrothgar wants to make sure Beowulf remembers that. Also, Hrothgar wants to make sure Beowulf knows it is because of God that we are here: “It is a miracle how the mighty Lord in his generosity gives wisdom and land and high estate to people on earth; all things are in His power” (lines 1708-1711). However, parts of Hrothgar’s parting words to Beowulf are presented as a warning to never become arrogant and pompous, and to remain true to himself. Hrothgar explains that if Beowulf starts to become arrogant, the pride and greed in his body will take over and become his demise. Reputations were important at this period of time, but Hrothgar is warning Beowulf not to let his reputation get ahead of him. Hrothgar states that the only way for Beowulf to attain true happiness is for him to avoid succumbing to sin and temptation. Hrothgar tells Beowulf that his time on this earth is short, and we must all live as virtuously as possible to live an ever-lasting life in heaven. Finally, he thanks God that he lived to see Beowulf’s triumphs, and he invites him to feast and share the treasures.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Monday, September 20, 2010
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Kevin McAdam
AP English 11/ Mr. George
5/25/10
Outliers Assignment #1
The Upper Hand
In my time in elementary school, I honestly did not gain many special advantages compared to the other students that allowed me to excel academically. My elementary school was run so that each child was given an equal opportunity to learn, but there were not many advanced courses for gifted students. However, there are certain aspects of my elementary school education that did set me on the right course for success.
I now realize how lucky I have been in my life because of the education I have received. A primary example of how I got an advantage in my educational success is that I was able to attend pre-school. Being able to go to pre-school when I was about four or five years old gave me a huge advantage over those who did not attend pre-school because I was able to benefit from having the experience of being in a learning environment at an early age.
While I was given a head start in pre-school, there were few, if any, courses for gifted students at the private elementary school I went to. Even if there were not many advanced courses at my elementary school, I did go to a private school which is an advantage in it of itself. At a private school, the students there are placed in a better learning environment than most public schools as many public schools lack funding for supplies and motivation from faculty members to teach. Also, attending a private elementary school directed me towards attending a high school like Trinity where I have more opportunities for success. However, if I attended a public elementary school, I most likely would have been easily persuaded to flow right into Waltham High School like so many other public school kids I know from my hometown.
The only advanced course I can think of being in while in elementary school was an Algebra I course I took in eighth grade. It was for a select few in my class who had above average math grades and displayed a unique ability in the subject. This was also a terrific advantage for me upon entering high school as it allowed me to forego taking Algebra I as a freshman and move straight into Geometry. As I have progressed through my years at Trinity, I realize how important that eighth grade Algebra I class was because it gave me the opportunity to take AP Calculus as a senior and, perhaps, forego a semester of math while in college. It is shocking how one small advantage given to me in eighth grade can have such a profound effect on my high school and college careers.
Being part of the AP English 11 class this year has had an indescribable effect on my intellectual development. It is very similar to the example of the hockey players in Outliers because I have been given the opportunity to learn from the best and develop my English skills much more than I could have in the college prep class. Also, not only am I learning from the best, I am in a class competing against the best and learning from my classmates, just like the hockey players on the more advanced teams.
There is a tremendous correlation between the educational advantages I have been given and the success I have attained as a student at Trinity. Without the advantages that I have listed, I most likely would be simply an average student taking average courses at an average school, but thankfully, that is not the case. I have taken advantage of the many great opportunities I have had in my life and those advantages have transformed me into the successful student I am today.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Kevin McAdam
AP English 11/ Mr. George
4/5/10
Final Essay on Sin Topic #1
Doing what is right during times of tremendous adversity is one of the most difficult challenges one must face as a human being. Sometimes we obey our conscience and do what is right, but other times we may succumb to temptation even when we know it is wrong. The true measure of the moral stature of a human being is not how often one does the right thing, but how often one admits their wrongdoings and attempts to gain redemption for their sins. In The Crucible, The Scarlet Letter, and The Picture of Dorian Gray, several characters are presented with situations in which they chose to either bear their sins publicly, privately, or to ignore their sins altogether. The decisions made by these characters dramatically impacted how these people thought and acted for the rest of the novel, resulting in both good and bad outcomes. In reading the texts, the outcome of characters who admitted their sins to a public audience was generally greater than the outcome of characters that chose to keep their sins private or to ignore their sins. There is undoubtedly much truth in the quote that the topic of this paper is based on. There are, however, certain sections of this quote that apply to different characters in the three novels. The sections of the quote that are most relevant to the texts are, “Yet it was his duty to confess, to suffer public shame, and to make public atonement” (Wilde 228), “to tell their sins to earth as well as to heaven” (228), and, “Nothing that he could do would cleanse him till he had told his own sin” (228).
As previously stated, one’s character can be defined by how often they repent for their mistakes. Even after you commit a sin, your conscience still rings in your head telling you that you did something wrong and you must make corrections in your life to make yourself a better person. Throughout the three novels, there were numerous examples of characters that admitted their sins and accepted their punishment while others kept their sins to themselves. In The Scarlet Letter, one great example of someone who felt the moral, “duty to confess, to suffer pubic shame, and to make public atonement” (228) was Hester Prynne. Whether or not Hester actually desired to make her sins know publicly, her adultery was displayed to Boston because of her pregnancy. The fact that Hester’s sins were revealed involuntarily actually can be looked at as a good thing for her. Since Hester had no choice in the matter, she was able to accept her punishment much easier, and fight to work her way back to being an upstanding citizen in Boston. As is the case with most, if not all, of the characters involved in scandalous events, admitting their sins is definitely the most difficult obstacle to overcome. Because Hester’s sins were presented for her, she was given a leg up on the other characters on her road to redemption. The fact that Hester did not have the responsibility to confess her sins only gave her more incentive to accept her punishment and prove that she was truly sorry for what she did. By admitting her sins, the town of Boston would be able to tell that Hester regretted her actions, but she was stripped of that opportunity. Through her penance, Hester proved to the town, herself, and to God that she was sorry. And in the end, Hester’s strategy to gain redemption and peace paid off as eventually “many people refused to interpret the scarlet A by its original signification. They said that it meant Able” (Hawthorne 146).
Although Hester Prynne was one character who confessed her sins publicly and found redemption, there were many other characters that hid from their “duty to confess” (28) for various different reasons. On example of a character who decided not to admit his sins to the public was Reverend Dimmesdale, also from The Scarlet Letter. His motives for concealing his true identity were not out of selfishness or pride, but because of his faith in God and his desire to keep the same faith alive in the citizens of Boston. In Boston, Dimmesdale was townspeople’s spiritual leader. Before Dimmesdale even committed the sin of adultery, people in the town looked at him as its most noble subject as he, “was considered by his more fervent admirers as little less than a heaven-ordained apostle, destined… to do great deeds for the now feeble New England Church” (109). If Dimmesdale had confessed his sin of adultery alongside Hester, most likely the faith of the townspeople would go down with him. In knowing this fact, Dimmesdale attempted to keep his sin a secret, and he punished himself for what he did for many years. However, this method of gaining inner peace was unsuccessful as Dimmesdale could not gain redemption if the people did not know he did anything wrong. A great example of this is whenever Dimmesdale would try to say to the townspeople that he was a bad person they only thought better of him for being modest: “He had told his hearers that he was altogether vile, a viler companion of the vilest … They heard it all, and did but reverence him more” (131). The only time when Dimmesdale gained true peace within himself was when he finally confessed his sin to the public and tried to make things right. Dimmesdale’s only flaw on his quest for redemption was that he failed to recognize that the publicity of his sins was necessary for him to reach his goal. Dimmesdale had suffered within for so long with only negative results, but the moment when he finally accepted his fate publicly is when he found the redemption and forgiveness he had been searching for all those years.
The third subject, Dorian Gray, failed all three aspects on the road to redemption which resulted in arguably the worst result for any character out of all three novels. At the start of the novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian Gray was stymied by a whirlwind of confusion. His naiveté kept him from recognizing the bad influence that Lord Henry had on him. Once Dorian made the switch with his soul and the portrait, his life immediately started to go downhill. Dorian had finally realized how rotten his life had become after years of developing a bad reputation around London and witnessing the portrait deteriorate from the effect his sins had on it. Even after this realization, however, Dorian still had no intention of admitting to the public the secret he had kept hidden for eighteen years. In the other two novels, there were definitely characters who sinned, but in the end, they eventually confessed and gained redemption. But Dorian, however, became so twisted that, at the end of the novel, he decided that it was better to completely get rid of his own soul, which was represented in the portrait, than to make his sins known to the public and accept the shame for what he did: “As it had killed the painter, so it would kill the painter’s work and all that that meant. It would kill the past, and when that was dead he would be free. It would kill this monstrous soul-life, and without its hideous warnings he would be at peace” (Wilde 228-229). Dorian Gray foolishly believed that the best way to gain peace and redemption was to hide his sins which ultimately resulted in his own death. In the presentation of these three examples, it is obvious that there were many different reactions from the characters when presented with the opportunity to confess their sins and accept responsibility for their actions.
There are two major components that are involved with redemption and forgiveness: people and God. In the three texts, the concept of feeling remorse for one’s sins and seeking forgiveness appears quite often. Someone like John Proctor from The Crucible desired to be forgiven for his sins for a long time, but was afraid of the consequences. Living in Salem, a very strict theocracy, Proctor was forced to hide his dark past every day from the judgmental townspeople. In order to put an end to the witch trials, Proctor made the decision to reveal his sins to the public. When Danforth and Hathorne try to get Proctor to write his confession on paper, he refuses because he believes that his word is good enough. His confession was to gain God’s forgiveness, not theirs, and he did not want to tarnish his own name: “How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!” (Miller 143). While Proctor recognized the importance of making his sins known to the public, his true goal was to profess his sorrow to God and to gain redemption before his death. This sense of peace that Proctor found at the end of The Crucible was an equal accumulation of redemption from the townspeople and forgiveness from God, allowing Proctor to accept his fate. Conversely, throughout Dorian Gray’s lifetime, he had shunned God and morality out of his life forever. The fact that Dorian had no desire to embrace God at all was another factor that led to him to being lonely and miserable. Not only did Dorian hide his sins from others, he kept his sins from God. He threw away all affiliation to God when he gave up his soul for eternal beauty. Even though Proctor did not go to church, he still had the ability to believe. Dorian gave up that ability and lost all connection with God. An example of how Dorian could not reconcile his past is when he attempted to change his ways and not attempt to seduce Hetty. However, when he looked at the portrait, it only mocked his efforts because there was no penance that could take back all the pain and suffering he had caused to other people: “A cry of pain and indignation broke from him. He could see no change, save that in the eyes there was a look of cunning, and in the mouth the curved wrinkle of the hypocrite” (Wilde 227). Dorian had pushed God so far out of his life that it was impossible for him to call on God when he needed Him most.
In the three novels, without a doubt the biggest factor that went into making the decision of whether to bear one’s sins publicly or privately is the burning desire deep down inside their soul telling them to confess their sins. As we see with Dimmesdale and Proctor in both The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible respectively, is that they did choose to hide their sin initially, but in the end, they chose the righteous path to redemption. They each had their own reasons for hiding their sins, but their conscience told them towards the right decision. At the end of both of their novels, both Proctor and Dimmesdale knew they were going to die, and neither man yearned to have their sin remain with their soul as they passed on. However, in The Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian never makes the decision to confess his sins to the public because his soul had been taken from him and embodied through the portrait. The loss of his own soul ended up being Dorian’s demise as without his own soul, he had no basis to help him get back on the road towards redemption for his sins.
In all walks of life, whenever someone has a problem, the hardest thing for them to do is admit that problem and accept the consequences of their actions. That situation is apparent time and time again in The Crucible, The Scarlet Letter, and The Picture of Dorian Gray. The decisions by the characters in those novels influenced how they lived their lives and whether or not they reached their ultimate goal of peace. The characters in the novel that searched for redemption and purification were often the ones who attained peace, but those who rejected their sins and the necessity to repent came up empty handed when they reached the pearly gates.
Works Cited
Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. United States: Viking Penguin Inc, 1953
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray, New York, New York: Barnes & Noble Inc, 2003
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. New York, New York: Bantam Dell, 2003
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Kevin McAdam
AP English 11/ Mr. George
3/30/10
Dorian Gray Character Analysis #1
Dorian Gray
Dorian is a naïve, selfish character who lived for his beauty with no regard for others.
In society, we believe beauty to be a wonderful gift that can be very beneficial to a person. Dorian realized his beauty and the advantages that came with it, but not without the help of Lord Henry. Beauty can bring one power and allow one to influence others solely based on their appearance alone. Dorian understood this fact and longed to have eternal beauty, hence gaining eternal power. Dorian’s goal to preserve his own beauty at all costs led him to a lifetime of selfishness. Unfortunately, Dorian’s egotism allowed him to take the wonders of his beauty and turn them into a terrible hindrance that lingered over his own head. His naiveté blinded him from witnessing his own immorality, which led him to committing more horrible acts, eventually resulting in his own demise. Dorian used his beauty to gain power and influence, but Lord Henry rightly begged the question: “What does it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose … his own soul” (Wilde 220).
Dorian is like bum on the street. Dorian’s beauty is his existence on earth, and like a homeless person, Dorian will do whatever is necessary to maintain his existence. Neither has any sense of morality in reaching their goals either. Also, both accept themselves as how they are and do nothing to try and change their lives for the better.
A modern day example of Dorian would be Terrell Owens because of the way he uses his flamboyant character to gain attention, positively or negatively, reluctant to change, and without any care for what is said about himself.
Kevin McAdam
AP English 11/ Mr. George
3/30/10
Dorian Gray Character Analysis #2
Lord Henry
Lord Henry is a cunning convincing man who influences others through his articulate speeches.
Throughout the text, Lord Henry continually expressed believable statements that had no true meaning or emotion behind them. Dorian was especially hooked into Lord Henry as, “there was something in his low, languid voice that was absolutely fascinating” (Wilde 23), making him a perfect subject for Lord Henry to influence. Lord Henry never had a direct goal in his relationship with Dorian because Lord Henry always conducted himself in a position of indifference. Without the hindrance of being biased, Lord Henry was able to spout off any theory that popped into his mind and let people like Dorian carry it out. Lord Henry’s fantastic witticisms captivated his listeners and influenced them to do some foolish things, painting him in a negative light.
Lord Henry is like an everyday scientist. He must not be confused with a mad scientist because a mad scientist works towards an evil goal while a normal scientist searches for greater understanding. Like Lord Henry, a scientist works in a position of complete indifference. Lord Henry influenced Dorian so that he could observe the way he acted in regards to the information Lord Henry spread to him, not to improve his soul. They are both only interested in the result of their experiment and not in the well-being of the test subject.
Lord Henry is like Hitler because they both influenced innocent human lives and were indifferent to their well-being; only the well-being of the cause was important.
Monday, March 29, 2010
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Monday, March 8, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
AP English 11/ Mr. George
2/24/10
Scarlet Letter Essay
Public vs. Private
Redemption and the methods utilized to attain such redemption were the driving themes of both The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter. Characters from both novels were forced to make decisions on whether to acknowledge their sins of adultery publicly or privately. Furthermore, the choices they made great affected their outcome in the novels. After witnessing the results of the choices made by characters in both novels, the decision to bear one’s sins publicly was a superior alternative to confessing either privately or to disregard one’s sins altogether.
Hester Prynne from The Scarlet Letter is an obvious demonstration of a character who displayed her sins in front of a public audience. Hester was bound by her circumstance to present her sins publicly. Through her pregnancy, Hester was given an immediate burden that she was forced display throughout the town. On top of bearing a child as punishment for her sin, she was given the scarlet A, which afflicted her with feelings of immense shame that she could not ignore. Hester’s punishment gradually diminished her dignity as a human being because it tainted people’s opinions of her based on hasty generalizations: “From first to last, in short, Hester Prynne had always this dreadful agony in feeling a human eye upon the token; the spot never grew callous; it seemed, on the contrary, to grow more sensitive with daily torture” (Hawthorne 79). Publicly confessing her sins alienated her from society and left her by herself. This allowed her to reflect on her actions and realize the severity of what she had done, eventually making her a better person. Hester’s perseverance through adversity granted her the mental fortitude to understand and accept the consequences of her wrongdoings. Hester’s resolve and commitment to self- improvement allowed her to mold the scarlet A into a motivational asset. Hester’s ignominy appeared overwhelming and gave the impression of public demonstration of her sins as a bad decision.
In the debate of whether it is better to display one’s sins publicly or privately, close examination of each character’s final outcome is necessary to make an accurate conclusion. In Hester’s case, it was the public admission of her sins that allowed her to eventually regain acceptance into society and feel the sense redemption that she had been longing for. Hester went through extreme criticism and emotional agony on her journey for redemption, but it was worth the pain for her to become a better person in the end. Hester turned her sin into a tool for development and eventually the meaning of the A turned from “adulterer” to “able.” The detachment of the scarlet A from Hester’s chest was freedom. Freedom so strongly desired it was like removing the ball and chain off of a prisoner’s ankle. It was freedom that she had earned through physical charity in the community with her beautiful craftsmanship and through internal reflection. Although she had no choice in the matter, Hester’s public admittance of her sins eventually cleansed her of all that had transpired, not only in the eyes of the townspeople, but through Hester’s eyes as well. Hester went through the purest and most open form of repentance, allowing her to feel full redemption when the time came. Such a feeling could not be had through privacy because it deals with deceiving society and takes away from being fully merciful for one’s actions.
Obviously, there were several characters in both novels who were involved with the sin of adultery. One thing that can be said of these sinners is that they all acknowledged there sin in some way, with the one exception being Abigail Williams. In contrast to a character such as Hester, who put her sins on display in front of the entire town, Abigail Williams from The Crucible chose to ignore her adulterous mistakes completely. As a result, her outcome was far different from Hester’s. There are so many other things wrong with Abigail’s moral process that the fact that she ignores her sin is somewhat understated, but that is probably the way she would like it. As the novel shows, Abigail becomes consumed by her own power and is only motivated by the threat of death. In reflecting on this fact, Abigail did not have any desire to punish herself and feel shameful the way other characters did. Abigail was unique in that she was not motivated to reflect on any feelings of guilt or be interested in public redemption. It is not surprising that Abigail does not feel she has done wrong because of the way she manipulated others and sent others to their deaths to save herself. Her complete lack of morals liberated her from feeling any remorse for her actions. In addition to ignoring her sins and disregard the welfare of John Proctor, she retreated from her problems out of cowardice. In the end, because Abigail made no attempts to achieve reconciliation for her sins, the outcome the reader witnesses about seems fitting.
Abigail Williams’ end in the story is not surprising to the reader based on the decisions she made along the way. Abigail’s life in Boston is very similar to the way Abigail spent her time in Salem: “The legend has it that Abigail turned up later as a prostitute in Boston” (Miller 146). It is not a glamorous or desirable way to live, but she does whatever she needs to survive, just like she did during the witch trials. Perhaps if Abigail had admitted her sins before the witch trials had begun, she would have gone through a period of self- reflection and not acted so inappropriately. The way Abigail dealt with her sins, along with how she ended in the story, clearly display strong opposition to any defense of ignoring one’s sins instead of confronting them straight forward.
One of the most complex characters in both novels was John Proctor because of the distinctive way he concealed the truth about his sins, yet ultimately gained redemption. The reader observes Proctor as a somewhat reclusive character who does not stand out much at the beginning of The Crucible until we find out about his past with Abigail. We see he does not attempt to bring his sins into the open and deals with them through private methods. Proctor is constantly lured back by Abigail and Proctor struggles to resist the temptation as Ms. Williams once stated, “Do you tell me you’ve never looked up at my window?” (23). Throughout the novel, Proctor suppressed his sins because he feels he cannot be forgiven. He avoids attending church because of constant reminder of what he did. Proctor’s inability to act on his internal feelings causes him great distress as he is often conflicted with decisions he makes. Once again, it is a character’s lack of admission to their mistakes that keeps them from redemption.
In the case of Proctor however, his true colors become apparent before his death. He admits his mistake and gains his redemption that he struggled to obtain. There were many factors that went into his confession besides feelings of guilt however. For instance, the life Proctor’s wife, Elizabeth, was at stake and Proctor had the opportunity to display Abigail’s flaws also. The reader definitely views a drastic change in Proctor as the novel unfolds and his longing for redemption is revealed. However, Proctor’s methods for gaining redemption change along with his character. At the end of the novel, Proctor’s public display of his sins leaves him cleansed of all that he had done. After all the internal pain he had gone through, Proctor’s liberation upon death came from publicly admitting his sins, further proving that openness is the only way to be truly clean.
The final character examined is Reverend Dimmesdale from The Scarlet Letter, and his complex decisions regarding publicity and privacy bring up many elements for debate. Before Dimmesdale even committed the sin of adultery, he was looked upon by the town as its most noble subject as he, “was considered by his more fervent admirers as little less than a heaven-ordained apostle, destined… to do great deeds for the now feeble New England Church” (109). Any fault by him would mean disaster for the faith of all the citizens. Being in such a stressful position, Dimmesdale felt immense shame for his actions and knew what would happen if he revealed what he had done. Instead, he decided to punish himself privately in contrast to his paramour’s public consequence. By administering his own punishment without the people knowing, Dimmesdale attempted to find redemption, but his guilt was so great that he could hardly bear it. He not only felt guilty for his actions, but for leaving Hester to fend for herself. To compensate for his guilt, Dimmesdale physically punished himself by what was supposedly a branded A on his chest and changes in his appearance because of stress and anxiety. The emotional toll that keeping his secret hidden took on Dimmesdale was far greater than that of Hester, and his end was far worse also.
For Dimmesdale, after everything he put himself through, the one thing he desired most of all was redemption, and he could only get it by publicly confessing his sins. The mental, emotional, and physical torment that consumed seven years of Dimmesdale’s life was ended with one speech atop a scaffold. Like Proctor, he tried to keep his sins quiet and find his own personal redemption, but after personal reflection, the two men realized that a public confession was necessary for their desired feelings of salvation. However, Dimmesdale quest for redemption is more virtuous and true because he was compelled to by his conscience. On the other hand, Proctor had outside forces that influenced him to confess. In the end, the ultimate goal of redemption was reached by both men, only after they admitted their sins publicly.
A common theme found among the characters who publicly admitted their sins was that they all found some sort of peace, whether they lived or died. We all search for peace within ourselves for our whole lives, and if the characters involved with public admission found peace, then the decision to open themselves up is definitely superior to any alternative.
Works Cited
· Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. New York: Bantam, 1850.
· Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: Penguin, 1976.
